Saturday, October 12, 2019
Singerââ¬â¢s Practical Ethics Essay -- Papers Poverty Theory
 Singerââ¬â¢s Practical Ethics       St. Augustine once stated, ââ¬Å"The superfluities of the rich are the     necessities of the poor.  When you possess in excess, you possess what     belongs to the poorâ⬠ (Church 3).  This quotation expresses that the     less fortunate in our world deserve to own a part of all the excess     luxuries that are owned by the more wealthy people.  Therefore,     anything beyond the necessities of life can be considered something     that the poor should retain.  This idea is very similar to that of     Peter Singer, who contends that the injustice of people who live in     abundance while others starve is morally inexcusable.  He argues that     anyone who is able to aid the poor ought to donate in order to help     the crisis of world poverty and similar endeavors.  Singer explains     that if one is already living comfortably, the act of acquiring     luxuries to increase pleasure does not entail the same moral     importance as saving someoneââ¬â¢s life.  Since he is a utilitarian, he     judges whether acts are right or wrong based on the consequences the     action brings.  Therefore, if the consequence of the wealthy peopleââ¬â¢s     failure to donate money is that another poor person dies, then that is     just as bad as killing them, since they are consciously letting them     die.  In his work, Practical Ethics, Singer offers his thoughts about     oneââ¬â¢s obligations to world poverty and suggests what must be done to     fix this dilemma.  He questions whether it is ethical for people to     live a life of luxury while they allow others to barely survive, or     even die.        In the world today, there are two extremes of world poverty:  absolute     affluence and absolute poverty.  The basic definition ...              ...h is distributed in the     world.  There is no reason why some people should lead such luxurious     lives, while worrying about nonessential lavishness, as opposed to     oneââ¬â¢s survival like those in absolute poverty do.  As people who live     in a country of absolute affluence, we are all in the situation where     we can choose between sacrificing our luxuries to save a child versus     living in excess and allowing the poor to die.  What if everything     that we take for granted was removed from our lives?  We would then     live day to day as a means to survive, and only then would we truly     understand the lives of those in absolute poverty.          BIBLIOGRAPHY       Denny, Father Jack.  ââ¬Å"The Church in Action.â⬠  Received in Theology     class on April 1, 2004.        Singer, Peter.  Practical Ethics.  2nd Edition.  Cambridge University     Press, 1993.                         
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.